Definition of developmental surveillance
Developmental surveillance is the term that most accurately describes the approach currently practiced by many health care providers and other professionals for the early detection of developmental problems. Developmental surveillance is a flexible, continuous process in which knowledgeable professionals monitor a child's developmental status during the provision of health care services.
Developmental surveillance may be done using parent questionnaires and/or formal screening tests of general development to gather information. All of this information gathered by parent questionnaires and/or screening tests of general development is then reviewed by professionals involved with the developmental process and discussed with the child's parents.
An advantage of using parent questionnaires is that these help to involve the parents in monitoring their child's development. The formal screening tests of general development are typically administered by professionals or paraprofessionals. Appendix D contains a table describing some of the more commonly used tests of general development. An advantage of using standardized tests of general development is that normative data is often available so that a child's scores can be compared to those for typically developing children of the same age.
Identifying an increased concern based on surveillance findings
During the course of surveillance, the professionals may note certain behavioral characteristics that increase concerns that the child may have a specific developmental problem. These concerns may be based on clinical clues noted during the exam, information about risk factors, and parental concerns. Results of a general developmental screening test may also raise concerns about specific developmental problems. Such suspicions may lead the health care provider to do selective screening for a particular developmental problem such as autism or a communication disorder). Selective screening sometimes involves the use of screening tests specifically designed to identify children with that particular developmental problem.
Assessing developmental milestones that are relevant to autism
One method of developmental surveillance is for the professional to look for certain age-specific developmental milestones. Siegel (1991) has provided a useful series of tables on the normal developmental milestones in the social and communicative behavior domains that are pertinent to autism. This information from Siegel along with other information about clinical clues in articles reviewed by the panel was used to develop Table III-3: Developmental Milestones for Communication and Social Skills.
This table lists developmental milestones for communication and social skills, two of the developmental areas that define autism.
The items listed are developmental milestones that children following a typical developmental sequence should exhibit by the time they reach the specified age. Failure to achieve a developmental milestone is a clinical clue that raises concerns that the child may have autism or some other developmental delay or disorder.
Adapted from Siegel (1991) and Table III-5
General Principles of Developmental Surveillance for Young Children
| Evidence Ratings: [A] = Strong [B] = Moderate [C] = Limited [D1] = Opinion/No evidence meeting criteria [D2] = Literature not reviewed |
Recommendations
Importance and timing of developmental surveillance
Components of developmental surveillance
Developmental surveillance as part of periodic health exams
Using "developmental milestones" to assess the child's development
Need for further evaluation based on developmental surveillance findings
Identifying Clinical Clues and Parental Concerns of Possible Autism
Recommendations
Clinical clues of possible autism
If a professional suspects a developmental problem, including possible autism, it is recommended that this concern be discussed with the parents and that recommendations be made for appropriate further evaluation. [D2]
Addressing concerns of parents
The clinical clues listed in Table III-4 represent delayed or abnormal behaviors that are often seen in children with autism. Some of these findings may also be seen in children who do not have autism but who may have other developmental problems.
If any of these clinical clues are present, further assessment may be needed to evaluate the possibility of autism or other developmental problems.
Source: This table is derived from Table III-5, which shows clinical clues found in articles that met criteria for in-depth review.
Table III-5 lists behaviors used to identify children with autism that where shown to be clinical clues for autism in scientific studies meeting the criteria for adequate evidence about efficacy for this guideline. For each item listed, the table gives (1) the sensitivity and specificity for identifying autism versus other developmental problems and (2) the corresponding section of the DSM-IV criteria for autism. (See Appendix A for more information about sensitivity and specificity.)
| TEST (author, year) | Ability
to identify children with autism |
Relevant section in DSM-IV |
|
| Clinical Clue | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
|
ABC: (Oswald, 1991)
age of subjects: 2.5 to 31 years | |||
| Looks through people | 69% | 73% | (1A) |
| Not responsive to
other people's facial expressions/feelings |
65% | 64% | (1A) |
|
BSE: (Barthelemy, 1992) age of subjects: 2 to 8 years old | |||
| Is eager for aloneness | 60% | 98% | (1D) |
|
CHAT: (Baron-Cohen, 1996) age of subjects: all 18 months old | |||
| Lack of prot-declarative pointinga | 100% | 100% | (1C) |
| Lack of gaze monitoringb | 100% | 80% | (1C) |
| Lack of pretend play | - not reported | (2D) | |
| Lacks all 3 of the above behaviors | 100% | 95% | (1C&2D) |
|
a pointing at an object to
get another person to look at it; b following the gaze of another person who is looking at an object |
|||
|
DSM-III-R: (Siegel, 1990) age of subjects: all < 4 years old | |||
| Social interaction | |||
| Not aware of others | 80% | 81% | (1D) |
| No comfort seeking | 62% | 78% | (1D) |
| Impaired imitation | 78% | 77% | (1C) |
| No social play | 98% | 44% | (2D) |
| No peer friends | 100% | 39% | (1B) |
| Communication | |||
| No communication | 37% | 89% | (2A) |
| No nonverbal communication | 85% | 65% | (2A) |
| No imagination | 81% | 50% | (2D) |
| Abnormal speech | 81% | 50% | (2A) |
| Abnormal language | 33% | 63% | (2C) |
| Nonconversational | 75% | 50% | (2B) |
| Activities and interests | |||
| Motor stereotypies | 73% | 71% | (3C) |
| Sensory preoccupation | 40% | 91% | (3A) |
| Distress over changes | 44% | 85% | (3B) |
| Insistence on routines | 79% | 66% | (3B) |
| Restricted interests | 40% | 83% | (3A) |
| Optimal
solution
Not aware of others and no peer friends |
81% | 84% | (1D&1B) |
|
ADI-R: (Lord, 1997) age of subjects: 2 to 43 years old | |||
| Impairment in social interactionsc | |||
| Lack of social responsiveness | 97% | 39% | (1C) |
| Lack of social reciprocity | 95% | 48% | (1D) |
| Does not form friendships | 96% | 57% | (1B) |
| Lack of cooperative playd | 94% | 30% | (1C) |
| Lack of turn taking / imitation | 96% | 35% | (1C) |
| Unable to share pleasure | 91% | 48% | (1D) |
| Abnormal quality of social overtures | 96% | 57% | (1C) |
| Impairment in communicationc | |||
| Does not point to get desired objects | 91% | 47% | (1A) |
| Few expressive, inactive gestures | 100% | 26% | (1A) |
| Lack of nonverbal intentionality | 95% | 42% | (1A) |
| Limited initiation of activity/play | 99% | 67% | (2D) |
| Restricted, repetitive behaviors c | |||
| Hand and finger mannerisms | 89% | 76% | (3C) |
| Limited curiosity in activities/play | 99% | 57% | (2D) |
| Limited sharing in others activities | 91% | 81% | (1C) |
| c | Data are for nonverbal subjects and all ratings are for "current" behavior except as noted by d below. | ||
| d | Scored as positive if the subject had "ever" had the behavior for at least a 3-month period when over 18 months mental age. | ||
Send questions or comments to:
bei@health.state.ny.us
Revised: November 1999