Colorectal Cancer Incidence by ZIP code , Erie County, 2005-2009
Source: New York State Cancer Registry
| Primary ZIP Code |
Post Office | Included ZIP Codes | Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | |||
| 14001 | Akron* | 10 | 14.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | 25 | 14.0 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 14004 | Alden* | 14038 | 17 | 20.4 | 15 to 50% below expected | 12 | 19.9 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 14006 | Angola | 18 | 14.4 | 15 to 49% above expected | 18 | 13.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14013 | Basom* | 14003 | 4 | 2.3 | Very sparse data | 1 | 2.2 | Very sparse data |
| 14025 | Boston | 2 | 4.2 | Very sparse data | 6 | 3.5 | Very sparse data | |
| 14026 | Bowmansville | 2 | 1.3 | Very sparse data | 0 | 1.5 | Very sparse data | |
| 14030 | Chaffee | 14134 | 3 | 2.3 | Very sparse data | 1 | 1.9 | Very sparse data |
| 14031 | Clarence | 11 | 15.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | 18 | 18.6 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14032 | Clarence Center | 11 | 7.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | 6 | 6.5 | Very sparse data | |
| 14033 | Colden | 2 | 3.7 | Very sparse data | 3 | 3.0 | Very sparse data | |
| 14034 | Collins | 14035 | 2 | 5.0 | Very sparse data | 3 | 2.5 | Very sparse data |
| 14037 | Cowlesville* | 2 | 1.8 | Very sparse data | 5 | 1.4 | Very sparse data | |
| 14043 | Depew | 47 | 39.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | 32 | 39.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14047 | Derby | 14112 | 10 | 8.9 | Within 15% of expected | 8 | 8.7 | Within 15% of expected |
| 14051 | East Amherst | 21 | 25.5 | 15 to 50% below expected | 17 | 21.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14052 | East Aurora | 14169 | 24 | 27.2 | Within 15% of expected | 20 | 27.4 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 14055 | East Concord | 0 | 2.1 | Very sparse data | 1 | 1.7 | Very sparse data | |
| 14057 | Eden | 10 | 12.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | 13 | 11.8 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14059 | Elma | 14140 | 11 | 15.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | 8 | 13.2 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 14068 | Getzville | 12 | 9.8 | 15 to 49% above expected | 15 | 11.6 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14069 | Glenwood | 3 | 1.2 | Very sparse data | 0 | 0.9 | Very sparse data | |
| 14072 | Grand Island | 33 | 26.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | 29 | 23.1 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14075 | Hamburg | 14010 | 61 | 60.8 | Within 15% of expected | 46 | 68.8 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 14080 | Holland | 3 | 5.6 | Very sparse data | 0 | 4.7 | Very sparse data | |
| 14085 | Lake View | 6 | 7.8 | Very sparse data | 7 | 6.8 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14086 | Lancaster | 50 | 41.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | 42 | 43.7 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14091 | Lawtons | 0 | 1.4 | Very sparse data | 2 | 1.2 | Very sparse data | |
| 14102 | Marilla | 0 | 2.1 | Very sparse data | 2 | 1.8 | Very sparse data | |
| 14111 | North Collins | 14027 | 10 | 4.1 | More than 50% above expected | 4 | 3.8 | Very sparse data |
| 14127 | Orchard Park | 14110 | 36 | 46.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | 44 | 47.9 | Within 15% of expected |
| 14139 | South Wales | 2 | 3.2 | Very sparse data | 2 | 2.6 | Very sparse data | |
| 14150 | Tonawanda | 14151 | 73 | 71.9 | Within 15% of expected | 86 | 69.7 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 14170 | West Falls | 8 | 3.4 | More than 50% above expected | 4 | 2.9 | Very sparse data | |
| 14201 | Buffalo | 16 | 15.6 | Within 15% of expected | 14 | 17.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14202 | Buffalo | 2 | 5.6 | Very sparse data | 2 | 4.5 | Very sparse data | |
| 14203 | Buffalo | 14205 | 3 | 2.7 | Very sparse data | 6 | 1.7 | Very sparse data |
| 14204 | Buffalo | 9 | 11.5 | 15 to 50% below expected | 17 | 13.8 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14206 | Buffalo | 14240 | 36 | 33.4 | Within 15% of expected | 37 | 37.9 | Within 15% of expected |
| 14207 | Buffalo | 28 | 25.8 | Within 15% of expected | 25 | 28.7 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14208 | Buffalo | 21 | 17.0 | 15 to 49% above expected | 19 | 23.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14209 | Buffalo | 4 | 11.1 | Very sparse data | 15 | 16.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14210 | Buffalo | 25 | 16.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | 19 | 18.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14211 | Buffalo | 22 | 27.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | 35 | 32.5 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14212 | Buffalo | 26 | 17.8 | 15 to 49% above expected | 11 | 18.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14213 | Buffalo | 26 | 23.3 | Within 15% of expected | 24 | 25.5 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14214 | Buffalo | 24 | 22.6 | Within 15% of expected | 28 | 27.3 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14215 | Buffalo | 61 | 41.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | 50 | 48.3 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14216 | Buffalo | 24 | 29.5 | 15 to 50% below expected | 26 | 34.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14217 | Buffalo | 40 | 34.6 | 15 to 49% above expected | 35 | 44.4 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14218 | Buffalo | 32 | 28.6 | Within 15% of expected | 30 | 30.4 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14219 | Buffalo | 23 | 16.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | 14 | 17.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14220 | Buffalo | 23 | 34.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | 34 | 39.7 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14221 | Buffalo | 14231 | 94 | 96.2 | Within 15% of expected | 111 | 112.2 | Within 15% of expected |
| 14222 | Buffalo | 12 | 16.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | 8 | 20.0 | 50% or more below expected | |
| 14223 | Buffalo | 34 | 38.6 | Within 15% of expected | 38 | 44.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14224 | Buffalo | 69 | 66.5 | Within 15% of expected | 70 | 67.0 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14225 | Buffalo | 62 | 56.7 | Within 15% of expected | 45 | 62.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14226 | Buffalo | 27 | 43.7 | 15 to 50% below expected | 37 | 47.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14227 | Buffalo | 45 | 39.7 | Within 15% of expected | 46 | 46.3 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14228 | Buffalo | 14260 | 19 | 22.8 | 15 to 50% below expected | 31 | 28.5 | Within 15% of expected |
Notes
- Incidence data are provisional, November 2011.
- *This ZIP Code crosses county boundaries. The values provided are for the entire ZIP Code, not just the portion in this county.
