Colorectal Cancer Incidence by ZIP code , Kings County (Brooklyn), 2005-2009
Source: New York State Cancer Registry
| Primary ZIP Code |
Post Office | Included ZIP Codes | Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | |||
| 11201 | Brooklyn | 11202 | 53 | 66.4 | 15 to 50% below expected | 63 | 66.7 | Within 15% of expected |
| 11203 | Brooklyn | 90 | 86.6 | Within 15% of expected | 88 | 105.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 11204 | Brooklyn | 106 | 97.3 | Within 15% of expected | 127 | 103.0 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 11205 | Brooklyn | 42 | 32.8 | 15 to 49% above expected | 29 | 39.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 11206 | Brooklyn | 75 | 60.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | 77 | 73.4 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11207 | Brooklyn | 91 | 73.0 | 15 to 49% above expected | 81 | 87.1 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11208 | Brooklyn | 11256 | 88 | 72.5 | 15 to 49% above expected | 79 | 77.7 | Within 15% of expected |
| 11209 | Brooklyn | 99 | 101.9 | Within 15% of expected | 115 | 117.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11210 | Brooklyn | 63 | 72.9 | Within 15% of expected | 67 | 81.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 11211 | Brooklyn | 86 | 76.1 | Within 15% of expected | 54 | 81.5 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 11212 | Brooklyn | 90 | 64.5 | 15 to 49% above expected | 102 | 87.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 11213 | Brooklyn | 70 | 53.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | 69 | 70.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11214 | Brooklyn | 143 | 134.0 | Within 15% of expected | 154 | 149.6 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11215 | Brooklyn | 55 | 64.5 | Within 15% of expected | 72 | 66.0 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11216 | Brooklyn | 11247 | 47 | 52.2 | Within 15% of expected | 79 | 62.0 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 11217 | Brooklyn | 43 | 34.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | 34 | 38.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11218 | Brooklyn | 77 | 83.0 | Within 15% of expected | 90 | 88.6 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11219 | Brooklyn | 108 | 96.8 | Within 15% of expected | 104 | 103.7 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11220 | Brooklyn | 105 | 92.9 | Within 15% of expected | 108 | 92.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 11221 | Brooklyn | 91 | 66.9 | 15 to 49% above expected | 82 | 78.1 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11222 | Brooklyn | 40 | 50.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | 56 | 51.1 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11223 | Brooklyn | 97 | 111.7 | Within 15% of expected | 126 | 119.7 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11224 | Brooklyn | 125 | 81.4 | More than 50% above expected | 111 | 98.4 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11225 | Brooklyn | 68 | 57.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | 67 | 72.4 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11226 | Brooklyn | 98 | 85.9 | Within 15% of expected | 107 | 106.1 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11228 | Brooklyn | 52 | 64.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | 69 | 71.7 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11229 | Brooklyn | 120 | 126.1 | Within 15% of expected | 150 | 136.1 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11230 | Brooklyn | 128 | 113.3 | Within 15% of expected | 146 | 120.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 11231 | Brooklyn | 24 | 34.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | 47 | 38.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 11232 | Brooklyn | 20 | 23.8 | 15 to 50% below expected | 18 | 21.8 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 11233 | Brooklyn | 58 | 53.4 | Within 15% of expected | 79 | 72.0 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11234 | Brooklyn | 126 | 118.4 | Within 15% of expected | 115 | 123.6 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11235 | Brooklyn | 162 | 149.9 | Within 15% of expected | 202 | 163.1 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 11236 | Brooklyn | 99 | 95.1 | Within 15% of expected | 111 | 113.4 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11237 | Brooklyn | 33 | 33.9 | Within 15% of expected | 35 | 34.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11238 | Brooklyn | 51 | 48.5 | Within 15% of expected | 55 | 57.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 11239 | Brooklyn | 42 | 20.6 | More than 50% above expected | 53 | 28.3 | More than 50% above expected | |
Notes
- Incidence data are provisional, November 2011.
- *This ZIP Code crosses county boundaries. The values provided are for the entire ZIP Code, not just the portion in this county.
