Colorectal Cancer Incidence by ZIP code , Monroe County, 2005-2009
Source: New York State Cancer Registry
| Primary ZIP Code |
Post Office | Included ZIP Codes | Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | |||
| 14414 | Avon* | 13 | 8.9 | 15 to 49% above expected | 10 | 9.0 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14416 | Bergen* | 7 | 5.0 | 15 to 49% above expected | 9 | 4.3 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 14420 | Brockport* | 14430 | 23 | 20.5 | Within 15% of expected | 28 | 20.8 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 14428 | Churchville* | 12 | 9.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | 8 | 8.4 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14445 | East Rochester | 8 | 10.5 | 15 to 50% below expected | 6 | 11.7 | Very sparse data | |
| 14450 | Fairport | 43 | 54.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | 48 | 53.7 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14464 | Hamlin | 14508 | 15 | 7.6 | More than 50% above expected | 4 | 6.5 | Very sparse data |
| 14467 | Henrietta | 13 | 12.6 | Within 15% of expected | 10 | 11.3 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14468 | Hilton | 20 | 21.1 | Within 15% of expected | 17 | 18.8 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14472 | Honeoye Falls* | 9 | 11.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | 7 | 11.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14482 | Le Roy* | 13 | 12.8 | Within 15% of expected | 13 | 13.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14502 | Macedon* | 16 | 11.1 | 15 to 49% above expected | 8 | 9.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14506 | Mendon | 0 | 1.7 | Very sparse data | 2 | 1.2 | Very sparse data | |
| 14514 | North Chili | 8 | 7.2 | Within 15% of expected | 10 | 7.6 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14526 | Penfield | 24 | 29.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | 32 | 28.6 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14534 | Pittsford* | 40 | 52.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | 51 | 48.3 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14543 | Rush | 5 | 4.3 | Very sparse data | 5 | 3.6 | Very sparse data | |
| 14546 | Scottsville* | 14511 | 6 | 6.5 | Very sparse data | 7 | 6.2 | Within 15% of expected |
| 14559 | Spencerport | 14410 | 21 | 21.8 | Within 15% of expected | 20 | 19.3 | Within 15% of expected |
| 14564 | Victor* | 14453 | 18 | 16.7 | Within 15% of expected | 18 | 14.6 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 14580 | Webster | 59 | 69.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | 58 | 66.8 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14586 | West Henrietta | 6 | 7.6 | Very sparse data | 12 | 7.0 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 14604 | Rochester | 14603 | 1 | 2.8 | Very sparse data | 4 | 3.0 | Very sparse data |
| 14605 | Rochester | 11 | 10.1 | Within 15% of expected | 15 | 10.4 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14606 | Rochester | 36 | 35.3 | Within 15% of expected | 45 | 36.8 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14607 | Rochester | 12 | 18.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | 12 | 18.8 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14608 | Rochester | 14614 | 16 | 11.1 | 15 to 49% above expected | 9 | 11.2 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 14609 | Rochester | 51 | 51.5 | Within 15% of expected | 61 | 57.7 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14610 | Rochester | 8 | 23.1 | 50% or more below expected | 23 | 28.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14611 | Rochester | 24 | 16.5 | 15 to 49% above expected | 29 | 16.9 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 14612 | Rochester | 14515 | 44 | 46.6 | Within 15% of expected | 34 | 48.7 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 14613 | Rochester | 15 | 12.4 | 15 to 49% above expected | 14 | 12.6 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14615 | Rochester | 14 | 18.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | 14 | 17.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14616 | Rochester | 39 | 41.2 | Within 15% of expected | 37 | 42.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14617 | Rochester | 35 | 41.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | 40 | 42.5 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14618 | Rochester | 36 | 34.5 | Within 15% of expected | 36 | 38.6 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14619 | Rochester | 17 | 13.1 | 15 to 49% above expected | 22 | 14.9 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14620 | Rochester | 14627, 14642 | 23 | 32.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | 34 | 45.1 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 14621 | Rochester | 43 | 35.4 | 15 to 49% above expected | 42 | 45.3 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14622 | Rochester | 22 | 21.6 | Within 15% of expected | 21 | 23.1 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14623 | Rochester | 14692 | 21 | 27.8 | 15 to 50% below expected | 15 | 30.7 | 50% or more below expected |
| 14624 | Rochester | 56 | 54.6 | Within 15% of expected | 48 | 51.8 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14625 | Rochester | 18 | 18.9 | Within 15% of expected | 20 | 17.1 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14626 | Rochester | 45 | 45.8 | Within 15% of expected | 50 | 47.3 | Within 15% of expected | |
Notes
- Incidence data are provisional, November 2011.
- *This ZIP Code crosses county boundaries. The values provided are for the entire ZIP Code, not just the portion in this county.
