Colorectal Cancer Incidence by ZIP code , Nassau County, 2005-2009

Source: New York State Cancer Registry

Primary
ZIP Code
Post Office Included ZIP Codes Males Females
Number
of Cases
Observed
Number
of Cases
Expected
Percent Difference from Expected Number
of Cases
Observed
Number
of Cases
Expected
Percent Difference from Expected
11001 Floral Park* 11002 39 39.0 Within 15% of expected 43 40.3 Within 15% of expected
11003 Elmont 50 49.0 Within 15% of expected 39 51.9 15 to 50% below expected
11010 Franklin Square 45 38.9 15 to 49% above expected 46 39.9 15 to 49% above expected
11020 Great Neck 2 11.1 Very sparse data 5 12.1 Very sparse data
11021 Great Neck 11022 36 33.2 Within 15% of expected 36 36.0 Within 15% of expected
11023 Great Neck 20 16.0 15 to 49% above expected 11 13.2 15 to 50% below expected
11024 Great Neck 11 12.8 Within 15% of expected 7 10.5 15 to 50% below expected
11030 Manhasset 11547 20 31.9 15 to 50% below expected 28 29.9 Within 15% of expected
11040 New Hyde Park* 11042 75 73.7 Within 15% of expected 67 71.9 Within 15% of expected
11050 Port Washington 36 43.2 15 to 50% below expected 33 40.8 15 to 50% below expected
11096 Inwood 8 8.7 Within 15% of expected 6 10.4 Very sparse data
11501 Mineola 27 27.9 Within 15% of expected 30 28.8 Within 15% of expected
11507 Albertson 7 13.2 15 to 50% below expected 7 11.7 15 to 50% below expected
11509 Atlantic Beach 2 5.1 Very sparse data 9 4.6 More than 50% above expected
11510 Baldwin 60 41.9 15 to 49% above expected 37 41.9 Within 15% of expected
11514 Carle Place 8 7.4 Within 15% of expected 5 7.0 Very sparse data
11516 Cedarhurst 6 10.1 Very sparse data 3 10.2 Very sparse data
11518 East Rockaway 14 15.8 Within 15% of expected 13 16.0 15 to 50% below expected
11520 Freeport 42 49.0 Within 15% of expected 67 52.0 15 to 49% above expected
11530 Garden City 11531 37 41.7 Within 15% of expected 42 41.0 Within 15% of expected
11542 Glen Cove 52 41.8 15 to 49% above expected 46 46.8 Within 15% of expected
11545 Glen Head 21 20.6 Within 15% of expected 17 18.6 Within 15% of expected
11548 Greenvale 1 1.7 Very sparse data 2 1.7 Very sparse data
11550 Hempstead 68 52.2 15 to 49% above expected 64 61.1 Within 15% of expected
11552 West Hempstead 38 32.2 15 to 49% above expected 22 32.0 15 to 50% below expected
11553 Uniondale 11549 26 28.2 Within 15% of expected 35 32.2 Within 15% of expected
11554 East Meadow 46 57.1 15 to 50% below expected 57 56.6 Within 15% of expected
11557 Hewlett 15 13.8 Within 15% of expected 14 12.3 Within 15% of expected
11558 Island Park 15 12.3 15 to 49% above expected 10 12.1 15 to 50% below expected
11559 Lawrence 18 11.4 More than 50% above expected 11 10.8 Within 15% of expected
11560 Locust Valley 7 9.9 15 to 50% below expected 14 9.2 More than 50% above expected
11561 Long Beach 11569 48 65.1 15 to 50% below expected 57 71.6 15 to 50% below expected
11563 Lynbrook 43 36.6 15 to 49% above expected 53 39.3 15 to 49% above expected
11565 Malverne 17 15.0 Within 15% of expected 12 13.7 Within 15% of expected
11566 Merrick 51 50.0 Within 15% of expected 42 45.7 Within 15% of expected
11568 Old Westbury 6 6.2 Very sparse data 0 4.9 Very sparse data
11570 Rockville Centre 30 38.0 15 to 50% below expected 37 43.6 15 to 50% below expected
11572 Oceanside 46 49.8 Within 15% of expected 47 46.4 Within 15% of expected
11575 Roosevelt 15 14.5 Within 15% of expected 17 14.9 Within 15% of expected
11576 Roslyn 21 24.4 Within 15% of expected 24 21.5 Within 15% of expected
11577 Roslyn Heights 18 19.2 Within 15% of expected 20 17.0 15 to 49% above expected
11579 Sea Cliff 7 8.1 Within 15% of expected 5 7.3 Very sparse data
11580 Valley Stream 11582 52 53.5 Within 15% of expected 67 57.3 15 to 49% above expected
11581 Valley Stream 31 34.6 Within 15% of expected 33 32.1 Within 15% of expected
11590 Westbury 48 56.4 Within 15% of expected 61 55.0 Within 15% of expected
11596 Williston Park 8 15.5 15 to 50% below expected 14 15.6 Within 15% of expected
11598 Woodmere 19 22.3 Within 15% of expected 25 20.3 15 to 49% above expected
11709 Bayville 11 10.3 Within 15% of expected 7 9.6 15 to 50% below expected
11710 Bellmore 45 49.2 Within 15% of expected 55 46.2 15 to 49% above expected
11714 Bethpage 37 37.1 Within 15% of expected 26 36.6 15 to 50% below expected
11732 East Norwich 8 5.6 15 to 49% above expected 8 5.2 More than 50% above expected
11735 Farmingdale* 49 43.7 Within 15% of expected 48 42.9 Within 15% of expected
11753 Jericho 13 19.5 15 to 50% below expected 15 16.1 Within 15% of expected
11756 Levittown 59 55.6 Within 15% of expected 45 53.9 15 to 50% below expected
11758 Massapequa 83 79.2 Within 15% of expected 89 75.0 15 to 49% above expected
11762 Massapequa Park 38 35.5 Within 15% of expected 33 34.5 Within 15% of expected
11765 Mill Neck 0 0.9 Very sparse data 0 0.7 Very sparse data
11771 Oyster Bay 12 17.2 15 to 50% below expected 17 16.1 Within 15% of expected
11783 Seaford 26 31.5 15 to 50% below expected 31 29.4 Within 15% of expected
11791 Syosset 25 38.1 15 to 50% below expected 38 34.5 Within 15% of expected
11793 Wantagh 41 46.2 Within 15% of expected 47 44.1 Within 15% of expected
11797 Woodbury 4 17.4 Very sparse data 20 22.7 Within 15% of expected
11801 Hicksville 58 59.2 Within 15% of expected 66 57.5 Within 15% of expected
11803 Plainview 34 47.3 15 to 50% below expected 43 44.6 Within 15% of expected
11804 Old Bethpage 9 8.4 Within 15% of expected 7 7.7 Within 15% of expected

Notes

  • Incidence data are provisional, November 2011.
  • *This ZIP Code crosses county boundaries. The values provided are for the entire ZIP Code, not just the portion in this county.