Colorectal Cancer Incidence by ZIP code , Onondaga County, 2005-2009
Source: New York State Cancer Registry
| Primary ZIP Code |
Post Office | Included ZIP Codes | Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | |||
| 13027 | Baldwinsville | 13137 | 42 | 39.3 | Within 15% of expected | 32 | 38.0 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 13029 | Brewerton | 9 | 6.8 | 15 to 49% above expected | 6 | 6.0 | Very sparse data | |
| 13030 | Bridgeport* | 5 | 6.1 | Very sparse data | 6 | 5.2 | Very sparse data | |
| 13031 | Camillus | 27 | 25.6 | Within 15% of expected | 24 | 23.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 13035 | Cazenovia* | 9 | 12.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | 8 | 11.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 13037 | Chittenango* | 11 | 11.0 | Within 15% of expected | 14 | 10.5 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13039 | Cicero | 11 | 18.5 | 15 to 50% below expected | 23 | 16.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13041 | Clay | 10 | 10.0 | Within 15% of expected | 5 | 8.4 | Very sparse data | |
| 13052 | De Ruyter* | 1 | 2.5 | Very sparse data | 5 | 2.2 | Very sparse data | |
| 13057 | East Syracuse | 23 | 23.3 | Within 15% of expected | 15 | 24.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 13060 | Elbridge | 13153 | 7 | 4.3 | More than 50% above expected | 3 | 3.7 | Very sparse data |
| 13063 | Fabius | 0 | 2.5 | Very sparse data | 2 | 2.0 | Very sparse data | |
| 13066 | Fayetteville | 19 | 21.4 | Within 15% of expected | 28 | 21.0 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13077 | Homer* | 5 | 9.6 | Very sparse data | 10 | 9.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 13078 | Jamesville | 13138 | 11 | 15.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | 26 | 16.3 | More than 50% above expected |
| 13080 | Jordan* | 5 | 4.9 | Very sparse data | 7 | 4.4 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13082 | Kirkville* | 11 | 7.3 | More than 50% above expected | 5 | 6.5 | Very sparse data | |
| 13084 | La Fayette | 2 | 6.1 | Very sparse data | 6 | 5.6 | Very sparse data | |
| 13088 | Liverpool | 32 | 33.6 | Within 15% of expected | 40 | 34.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 13090 | Liverpool | 13089 | 34 | 31.0 | Within 15% of expected | 36 | 28.3 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 13104 | Manlius | 13051 | 16 | 20.7 | 15 to 50% below expected | 27 | 19.7 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 13108 | Marcellus | 7 | 8.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | 12 | 7.5 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13110 | Marietta | 4 | 3.2 | Very sparse data | 3 | 2.6 | Very sparse data | |
| 13112 | Memphis | 4 | 2.6 | Very sparse data | 1 | 2.2 | Very sparse data | |
| 13116 | Minoa | 5 | 4.4 | Very sparse data | 3 | 5.1 | Very sparse data | |
| 13120 | Nedrow | 0 | 3.3 | Very sparse data | 2 | 2.9 | Very sparse data | |
| 13122 | New Woodstock* | 4 | 1.6 | Very sparse data | 0 | 1.3 | Very sparse data | |
| 13135 | Phoenix* | 11 | 7.9 | 15 to 49% above expected | 20 | 7.3 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13141 | Preble* | 13087 | 1 | 1.1 | Very sparse data | 3 | 0.8 | Very sparse data |
| 13152 | Skaneateles* | 13119 | 19 | 14.4 | 15 to 49% above expected | 14 | 12.9 | Within 15% of expected |
| 13159 | Tully* | 13020 | 10 | 6.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | 6 | 5.8 | Very sparse data |
| 13164 | Warners | 3 | 2.4 | Very sparse data | 4 | 1.9 | Very sparse data | |
| 13166 | Weedsport* | 6 | 8.0 | Very sparse data | 4 | 7.3 | Very sparse data | |
| 13202 | Syracuse | 13201 | 4 | 4.5 | Very sparse data | 0 | 3.6 | Very sparse data |
| 13203 | Syracuse | 16 | 20.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | 19 | 24.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 13204 | Syracuse | 21 | 19.9 | Within 15% of expected | 18 | 22.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 13205 | Syracuse | 29 | 24.0 | 15 to 49% above expected | 36 | 31.6 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 13206 | Syracuse | 24 | 22.8 | Within 15% of expected | 23 | 24.8 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 13207 | Syracuse | 9 | 14.7 | 15 to 50% below expected | 9 | 15.7 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 13208 | Syracuse | 27 | 25.5 | Within 15% of expected | 30 | 30.0 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 13209 | Syracuse | 13 | 19.4 | 15 to 50% below expected | 24 | 20.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13210 | Syracuse | 13217, 13244 | 16 | 17.4 | Within 15% of expected | 20 | 24.1 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 13211 | Syracuse | 12 | 8.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | 7 | 9.4 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 13212 | Syracuse | 13220 | 25 | 31.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | 39 | 32.6 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 13214 | Syracuse | 10 | 13.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | 12 | 14.8 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 13215 | Syracuse | 20 | 22.8 | Within 15% of expected | 13 | 25.7 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 13219 | Syracuse | 19 | 29.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | 31 | 32.0 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 13224 | Syracuse | 10 | 12.7 | 15 to 50% below expected | 12 | 12.8 | Within 15% of expected | |
Notes
- Incidence data are provisional, November 2011.
- *This ZIP Code crosses county boundaries. The values provided are for the entire ZIP Code, not just the portion in this county.
