Colorectal Cancer Incidence by ZIP code , Westchester County, 2005-2009

Source: New York State Cancer Registry

Primary
ZIP Code
Post Office Included ZIP Codes Males Females
Number
of Cases
Observed
Number
of Cases
Expected
Percent Difference from Expected Number
of Cases
Observed
Number
of Cases
Expected
Percent Difference from Expected
10501 Amawalk 1 1.2 Very sparse data 1 0.9 Very sparse data
10502 Ardsley 10 9.9 Within 15% of expected 4 8.5 Very sparse data
10504 Armonk 6 11.6 Very sparse data 5 9.4 Very sparse data
10505 Baldwin Place 0 0.2 Very sparse data 0 0.2 Very sparse data
10506 Bedford 6 8.1 Very sparse data 7 6.3 Within 15% of expected
10507 Bedford Hills 9 7.2 15 to 49% above expected 8 7.3 Within 15% of expected
10510 Briarcliff Manor 10 14.2 15 to 50% below expected 14 14.7 Within 15% of expected
10511 Buchanan 5 3.2 Very sparse data 2 2.9 Very sparse data
10514 Chappaqua 11 15.7 15 to 50% below expected 11 12.7 Within 15% of expected
10518 Cross River 0 0.9 Very sparse data 0 0.8 Very sparse data
10520 Croton On Hudson 10521 17 20.4 15 to 50% below expected 22 23.7 Within 15% of expected
10522 Dobbs Ferry 11 15.6 15 to 50% below expected 15 17.1 Within 15% of expected
10523 Elmsford 8 10.3 15 to 50% below expected 9 9.7 Within 15% of expected
10526 Goldens Bridge 1 2.3 Very sparse data 1 2.0 Very sparse data
10527 Granite Springs 2 1.9 Very sparse data 2 1.4 Very sparse data
10528 Harrison 14 19.1 15 to 50% below expected 10 17.8 15 to 50% below expected
10530 Hartsdale 16 20.8 15 to 50% below expected 18 21.8 15 to 50% below expected
10532 Hawthorne 15 7.6 More than 50% above expected 12 7.0 More than 50% above expected
10533 Irvington 10503 12 11.1 Within 15% of expected 8 10.1 15 to 50% below expected
10536 Katonah 13 15.8 15 to 50% below expected 11 14.4 15 to 50% below expected
10537 Lake Peekskill* 0 2.3 Very sparse data 3 1.9 Very sparse data
10538 Larchmont 22 23.3 Within 15% of expected 24 22.2 Within 15% of expected
10541 Mahopac* 10542 30 33.6 Within 15% of expected 33 29.2 Within 15% of expected
10543 Mamaroneck 31 28.4 Within 15% of expected 30 29.8 Within 15% of expected
10546 Millwood 0 1.4 Very sparse data 1 1.1 Very sparse data
10547 Mohegan Lake 10 8.9 Within 15% of expected 8 8.8 Within 15% of expected
10548 Montrose 10596 5 6.9 Very sparse data 5 4.6 Very sparse data
10549 Mount Kisco 16 19.4 15 to 50% below expected 22 18.7 15 to 49% above expected
10550 Mount Vernon 10551 43 37.2 15 to 49% above expected 56 43.9 15 to 49% above expected
10552 Mount Vernon 35 30.6 Within 15% of expected 28 37.7 15 to 50% below expected
10553 Mount Vernon 11 11.7 Within 15% of expected 11 14.2 15 to 50% below expected
10560 North Salem 2 7.4 Very sparse data 5 8.3 Very sparse data
10562 Ossining 10545 28 39.6 15 to 50% below expected 32 39.9 15 to 50% below expected
10566 Peekskill 10517 25 27.0 Within 15% of expected 27 29.3 Within 15% of expected
10567 23 24.0 Within 15% of expected 26 21.9 15 to 49% above expected
10570 Pleasantville 8 16.3 50% or more below expected 10 15.0 15 to 50% below expected
10573 Port Chester 36 48.1 15 to 50% below expected 54 49.7 Within 15% of expected
10576 Pound Ridge 5 7.7 Very sparse data 5 5.9 Very sparse data
10577 Purchase 1 4.8 Very sparse data 5 4.0 Very sparse data
10578 Purdys 1 1.2 Very sparse data 1 1.0 Very sparse data
10580 Rye 22 23.6 Within 15% of expected 28 22.8 15 to 49% above expected
10583 Scarsdale 46 59.3 15 to 50% below expected 47 54.8 Within 15% of expected
10588 Shrub Oak 10535 4 2.9 Very sparse data 6 2.5 Very sparse data
10589 Somers 10519, 10540 14 20.2 15 to 50% below expected 25 21.0 15 to 49% above expected
10590 South Salem 14 8.4 More than 50% above expected 9 6.7 15 to 49% above expected
10591 Tarrytown 19 26.8 15 to 50% below expected 30 27.5 Within 15% of expected
10594 Thornwood 11 7.6 15 to 49% above expected 9 6.6 15 to 49% above expected
10595 Valhalla 8 11.2 15 to 50% below expected 11 12.6 Within 15% of expected
10597 Waccabuc 1 0.9 Very sparse data 0 0.7 Very sparse data
10598 Yorktown Heights 10587 33 42.9 15 to 50% below expected 46 43.4 Within 15% of expected
10601 White Plains 20 11.8 More than 50% above expected 16 17.1 Within 15% of expected
10603 White Plains 20 22.2 Within 15% of expected 24 25.1 Within 15% of expected
10604 West Harrison 16 13.6 15 to 49% above expected 9 14.4 15 to 50% below expected
10605 White Plains 27 31.8 15 to 50% below expected 28 32.3 Within 15% of expected
10606 White Plains 10602 22 20.3 Within 15% of expected 12 23.6 15 to 50% below expected
10607 White Plains 10 10.6 Within 15% of expected 2 10.2 Very sparse data
10701 Yonkers 10702 73 63.1 15 to 49% above expected 67 70.8 Within 15% of expected
10703 Yonkers 33 31.6 Within 15% of expected 34 37.0 Within 15% of expected
10704 Yonkers 62 47.9 15 to 49% above expected 52 48.9 Within 15% of expected
10705 Yonkers* 33 39.5 15 to 50% below expected 38 40.0 Within 15% of expected
10706 Hastings On Hudson 5 13.6 Very sparse data 14 13.2 Within 15% of expected
10708 Bronxville 24 35.5 15 to 50% below expected 44 41.2 Within 15% of expected
10709 Eastchester 10707 22 28.9 15 to 50% below expected 46 29.1 More than 50% above expected
10710 Yonkers 37 48.4 15 to 50% below expected 35 49.7 15 to 50% below expected
10801 New Rochelle 10802 48 41.8 Within 15% of expected 62 47.9 15 to 49% above expected
10803 Pelham 18 16.1 Within 15% of expected 18 15.3 15 to 49% above expected
10804 Wykagyl 17 25.7 15 to 50% below expected 29 22.1 15 to 49% above expected
10805 New Rochelle 42 26.6 More than 50% above expected 25 33.5 15 to 50% below expected

Notes

  • Incidence data are provisional, November 2011.
  • *This ZIP Code crosses county boundaries. The values provided are for the entire ZIP Code, not just the portion in this county.