Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence by ZIP code , Monroe County, 2005-2009
Source: New York State Cancer Registry
| Primary ZIP Code |
Post Office | Included ZIP Codes | Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | |||
| 14414 | Avon* | 14 | 12.7 | Within 15% of expected | 17 | 11.6 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14416 | Bergen* | 9 | 7.1 | 15 to 49% above expected | 12 | 5.6 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 14428 | Churchville* | 19 | 12.9 | 15 to 49% above expected | 21 | 11.3 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 14445 | East Rochester | 15 | 14.8 | Within 15% of expected | 13 | 15.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14450 | Fairport | 56 | 75.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | 66 | 69.6 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14464 | Hamlin | 14508 | 10 | 10.4 | Within 15% of expected | 16 | 8.7 | More than 50% above expected |
| 14467 | Henrietta | 25 | 17.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | 15 | 15.4 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14468 | Hilton | 30 | 29.2 | Within 15% of expected | 32 | 24.5 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14472 | HoneoyeFalls* | 4 | 15.8 | Very sparse data | 11 | 13.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14506 | Mendon | 3 | 2.4 | Very sparse data | 3 | 1.7 | Very sparse data | |
| 14514 | North Chili | 16 | 10.2 | More than 50% above expected | 12 | 9.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14526 | Penfield | 31 | 41.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | 29 | 36.7 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14543 | Rush | 8 | 6.1 | 15 to 49% above expected | 1 | 4.9 | Very sparse data | |
| 14546 | Scottsville* | 14511 | 8 | 9.2 | Within 15% of expected | 11 | 8.3 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 14559 | Spencerport | 14410 | 32 | 30.6 | Within 15% of expected | 35 | 25.8 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 14580 | Webster | 84 | 99.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | 81 | 87.7 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14586 | West Henrietta | 5 | 10.3 | Very sparse data | 10 | 9.3 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14604 | Rochester | 14603 | 8 | 4.1 | More than 50% above expected | 6 | 3.9 | Very sparse data |
| 14605 | Rochester | 23 | 14.2 | More than 50% above expected | 13 | 13.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14606 | Rochester | 83 | 49.8 | More than 50% above expected | 59 | 48.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14607 | Rochester | 27 | 24.0 | Within 15% of expected | 15 | 21.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14608 | Rochester | 14614 | 35 | 15.3 | More than 50% above expected | 15 | 14.8 | Within 15% of expected |
| 14609 | Rochester | 89 | 71.5 | 15 to 49% above expected | 73 | 72.5 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14610 | Rochester | 21 | 32.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | 32 | 33.1 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14611 | Rochester | 49 | 23.2 | More than 50% above expected | 29 | 22.6 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14612 | Rochester | 14515 | 64 | 64.5 | Within 15% of expected | 79 | 61.6 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 14613 | Rochester | 27 | 16.6 | More than 50% above expected | 17 | 16.0 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14615 | Rochester | 26 | 25.0 | Within 15% of expected | 24 | 23.4 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14616 | Rochester | 68 | 58.4 | 15 to 49% above expected | 76 | 55.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14617 | Rochester | 43 | 58.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | 58 | 54.6 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14618 | Rochester | 36 | 48.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | 40 | 48.4 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14619 | Rochester | 28 | 18.1 | More than 50% above expected | 24 | 19.4 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14620 | Rochester | 14627, 14642 | 39 | 43.6 | Within 15% of expected | 33 | 50.9 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 14621 | Rochester | 73 | 48.8 | 15 to 49% above expected | 45 | 53.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 14622 | Rochester | 25 | 31.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | 40 | 29.9 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 14623 | Rochester | 14692 | 32 | 38.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | 52 | 37.9 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 14624 | Rochester | 79 | 77.1 | Within 15% of expected | 78 | 68.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14625 | Rochester | 27 | 27.1 | Within 15% of expected | 20 | 23.0 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 14626 | Rochester | 79 | 65.4 | 15 to 49% above expected | 78 | 61.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
Notes
- Incidence data are provisional, November 2011.
- *This ZIP Code crosses county boundaries. The values provided are for the entire ZIP Code, not just the portion in this county.
