Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence by ZIP code , Onondaga County, 2005-2009
Source: New York State Cancer Registry
| Primary ZIP Code |
Post Office | Included ZIP Codes | Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | |||
| 13027 | Baldwinsville | 13137 | 69 | 55.0 | 15 to 49% above expected | 76 | 50.0 | More than 50% above expected |
| 13029 | Brewerton | 14 | 9.5 | 15 to 49% above expected | 9 | 8.0 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 13030 | Bridgeport* | 12 | 8.8 | 15 to 49% above expected | 12 | 7.2 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13031 | Camillus | 46 | 37.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | 36 | 32.6 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 13035 | Cazenovia* | 13 | 17.5 | 15 to 50% below expected | 17 | 14.6 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13037 | Chittenango* | 20 | 15.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | 22 | 13.7 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13039 | Cicero | 30 | 25.5 | 15 to 49% above expected | 28 | 21.8 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13041 | Clay | 21 | 13.6 | More than 50% above expected | 21 | 11.3 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13057 | East Syracuse | 56 | 33.4 | More than 50% above expected | 50 | 32.3 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13060 | Elbridge | 13153 | 10 | 6.1 | More than 50% above expected | 8 | 5.0 | More than 50% above expected |
| 13063 | Fabius | 4 | 3.6 | Very sparse data | 5 | 2.7 | Very sparse data | |
| 13066 | Fayetteville | 18 | 30.5 | 15 to 50% below expected | 39 | 27.4 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13077 | Homer* | 15 | 13.6 | Within 15% of expected | 14 | 12.1 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13078 | Jamesville | 13138 | 14 | 21.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | 17 | 19.6 | Within 15% of expected |
| 13080 | Jordan* | 11 | 6.8 | More than 50% above expected | 12 | 5.7 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13082 | Kirkville* | 10 | 10.5 | Within 15% of expected | 13 | 8.8 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13084 | La Fayette | 15 | 8.6 | More than 50% above expected | 7 | 7.4 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 13088 | Liverpool | 56 | 47.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | 57 | 45.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13090 | Liverpool | 13089 | 47 | 42.6 | Within 15% of expected | 44 | 37.7 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 13104 | Manlius | 13051 | 33 | 29.2 | Within 15% of expected | 25 | 25.8 | Within 15% of expected |
| 13108 | Marcellus | 13 | 11.8 | Within 15% of expected | 14 | 10.0 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13110 | Marietta | 4 | 4.4 | Very sparse data | 1 | 3.4 | Very sparse data | |
| 13112 | Memphis | 1 | 3.6 | Very sparse data | 4 | 2.9 | Very sparse data | |
| 13116 | Minoa | 9 | 6.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | 11 | 6.2 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13120 | Nedrow | 7 | 4.5 | More than 50% above expected | 8 | 3.8 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13122 | NewWoodstock* | 1 | 2.3 | Very sparse data | 3 | 1.7 | Very sparse data | |
| 13141 | Preble* | 13087 | 2 | 1.5 | Very sparse data | 0 | 1.1 | Very sparse data |
| 13152 | Skaneateles* | 13119 | 13 | 20.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | 13 | 17.0 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 13159 | Tully* | 13020 | 5 | 9.4 | Very sparse data | 11 | 7.8 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 13164 | Warners | 2 | 3.3 | Very sparse data | 4 | 2.5 | Very sparse data | |
| 13166 | Weedsport* | 11 | 11.3 | Within 15% of expected | 13 | 9.6 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13202 | Syracuse | 13201 | 22 | 6.1 | More than 50% above expected | 10 | 4.7 | More than 50% above expected |
| 13203 | Syracuse | 43 | 27.7 | More than 50% above expected | 38 | 28.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13204 | Syracuse | 49 | 27.3 | More than 50% above expected | 42 | 27.6 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13205 | Syracuse | 65 | 33.8 | More than 50% above expected | 63 | 38.5 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13206 | Syracuse | 60 | 31.9 | More than 50% above expected | 57 | 31.9 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13207 | Syracuse | 22 | 20.2 | Within 15% of expected | 27 | 20.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13208 | Syracuse | 60 | 35.5 | More than 50% above expected | 49 | 37.2 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13209 | Syracuse | 28 | 27.7 | Within 15% of expected | 35 | 26.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13210 | Syracuse | 13217, 13244 | 28 | 23.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | 23 | 27.6 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 13211 | Syracuse | 25 | 11.7 | More than 50% above expected | 30 | 12.0 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 13212 | Syracuse | 13220 | 54 | 44.5 | 15 to 49% above expected | 74 | 43.0 | More than 50% above expected |
| 13214 | Syracuse | 17 | 20.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | 21 | 18.3 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 13215 | Syracuse | 23 | 31.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | 31 | 31.1 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 13219 | Syracuse | 44 | 41.7 | Within 15% of expected | 50 | 41.0 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 13224 | Syracuse | 24 | 18.1 | 15 to 49% above expected | 13 | 17.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
Notes
- Incidence data are provisional, November 2011.
- *This ZIP Code crosses county boundaries. The values provided are for the entire ZIP Code, not just the portion in this county.
