Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence by ZIP code , Westchester County, 2005-2009

Source: New York State Cancer Registry

Primary
ZIP Code
Post Office Included ZIP Codes Males Females
Number
of Cases
Observed
Number
of Cases
Expected
Percent Difference from Expected Number
of Cases
Observed
Number
of Cases
Expected
Percent Difference from Expected
10501 Amawalk 3 1.7 Very sparse data 3 1.3 Very sparse data
10502 Ardsley 7 14.2 50% or more below expected 6 11.6 Very sparse data
10504 Armonk 7 16.4 50% or more below expected 5 13.0 Very sparse data
10505 Baldwin Place 0 0.3 Very sparse data 0 0.2 Very sparse data
10506 Bedford 8 11.6 15 to 50% below expected 14 8.8 More than 50% above expected
10507 Bedford Hills 11 10.0 Within 15% of expected 17 9.4 More than 50% above expected
10510 Briarcliff Manor 10 19.8 15 to 50% below expected 25 18.6 15 to 49% above expected
10511 Buchanan 7 4.4 More than 50% above expected 5 3.8 Very sparse data
10514 Chappaqua 10 22.1 50% or more below expected 18 17.4 Within 15% of expected
10518 Cross River 0 1.3 Very sparse data 1 1.1 Very sparse data
10520 Croton On Hudson 10521 31 28.4 Within 15% of expected 35 28.7 15 to 49% above expected
10522 Dobbs Ferry 16 21.8 15 to 50% below expected 12 21.1 15 to 50% below expected
10523 Elmsford 14 14.4 Within 15% of expected 10 12.9 15 to 50% below expected
10526 Goldens Bridge 2 3.1 Very sparse data 2 2.7 Very sparse data
10527 Granite Springs 3 2.6 Very sparse data 1 2.0 Very sparse data
10528 Harrison 25 26.8 Within 15% of expected 16 23.4 15 to 50% below expected
10530 Hartsdale 20 29.6 15 to 50% below expected 39 29.5 15 to 49% above expected
10532 Hawthorne 16 10.7 15 to 49% above expected 8 9.3 Within 15% of expected
10533 Irvington 10503 12 15.6 15 to 50% below expected 17 13.6 15 to 49% above expected
10536 Katonah 10 22.3 50% or more below expected 12 18.7 15 to 50% below expected
10537 Lake Peekskill* 4 3.2 Very sparse data 4 2.6 Very sparse data
10538 Larchmont 20 32.6 15 to 50% below expected 26 29.0 Within 15% of expected
10541 Mahopac* 10542 44 47.2 Within 15% of expected 55 39.8 15 to 49% above expected
10543 Mamaroneck 35 39.6 Within 15% of expected 35 37.9 Within 15% of expected
10546 Millwood 0 2.0 Very sparse data 2 1.6 Very sparse data
10547 Mohegan Lake 18 12.3 15 to 49% above expected 10 11.4 Within 15% of expected
10548 Montrose 10596 13 9.8 15 to 49% above expected 5 6.1 Very sparse data
10549 Mount Kisco 30 27.0 Within 15% of expected 23 24.9 Within 15% of expected
10550 Mount Vernon 10551 68 52.0 15 to 49% above expected 57 57.5 Within 15% of expected
10552 Mount Vernon 35 42.7 15 to 50% below expected 39 46.8 15 to 50% below expected
10553 Mount Vernon 15 16.6 Within 15% of expected 9 19.0 50% or more below expected
10560 North Salem 10 10.3 Within 15% of expected 11 9.9 Within 15% of expected
10562 Ossining 10545 37 54.2 15 to 50% below expected 48 50.9 Within 15% of expected
10566 Peekskill 10517 48 37.0 15 to 49% above expected 42 37.4 Within 15% of expected
10567 33 33.4 Within 15% of expected 37 28.7 15 to 49% above expected
10570 Pleasantville 9 22.8 50% or more below expected 17 19.7 Within 15% of expected
10573 Port Chester 39 66.3 15 to 50% below expected 43 63.1 15 to 50% below expected
10576 Pound Ridge 6 11.0 Very sparse data 4 8.2 Very sparse data
10577 Purchase 3 6.8 Very sparse data 4 5.3 Very sparse data
10578 Purdys 1 1.7 Very sparse data 4 1.4 Very sparse data
10580 Rye 25 33.3 15 to 50% below expected 32 29.9 Within 15% of expected
10583 Scarsdale 46 84.5 15 to 50% below expected 55 73.2 15 to 50% below expected
10588 Shrub Oak 10535 7 4.0 More than 50% above expected 5 3.4 Very sparse data
10589 Somers 10519, 10540 19 30.3 15 to 50% below expected 38 29.1 15 to 49% above expected
10590 South Salem 6 11.8 Very sparse data 8 9.2 Within 15% of expected
10591 Tarrytown 24 37.3 15 to 50% below expected 37 36.0 Within 15% of expected
10594 Thornwood 4 10.8 Very sparse data 16 8.8 More than 50% above expected
10595 Valhalla 12 15.8 15 to 50% below expected 8 15.0 15 to 50% below expected
10597 Waccabuc 0 1.2 Very sparse data 1 1.0 Very sparse data
10598 Yorktown Heights 10587 33 60.4 15 to 50% below expected 57 56.3 Within 15% of expected
10601 White Plains 14 16.1 Within 15% of expected 23 21.2 Within 15% of expected
10603 White Plains 18 31.0 15 to 50% below expected 28 32.9 Within 15% of expected
10604 West Harrison 16 19.2 15 to 50% below expected 21 18.9 Within 15% of expected
10605 White Plains 34 45.7 15 to 50% below expected 46 43.1 Within 15% of expected
10606 White Plains 10602 18 27.7 15 to 50% below expected 20 28.9 15 to 50% below expected
10607 White Plains 10 15.2 15 to 50% below expected 6 13.8 Very sparse data
10701 Yonkers 10702 86 87.0 Within 15% of expected 90 90.5 Within 15% of expected
10703 Yonkers 54 44.8 15 to 49% above expected 40 46.6 Within 15% of expected
10704 Yonkers 61 68.6 Within 15% of expected 63 63.8 Within 15% of expected
10705 Yonkers* 51 55.0 Within 15% of expected 54 52.5 Within 15% of expected
10706 Hastings On Hudson 8 19.2 50% or more below expected 10 17.5 15 to 50% below expected
10708 Bronxville 39 50.6 15 to 50% below expected 43 53.8 15 to 50% below expected
10709 Eastchester 10707 27 41.3 15 to 50% below expected 46 38.2 15 to 49% above expected
10710 Yonkers 62 70.2 Within 15% of expected 66 66.7 Within 15% of expected
10801 New Rochelle 10802 62 58.0 Within 15% of expected 55 61.6 Within 15% of expected
10803 Pelham 21 22.5 Within 15% of expected 21 20.2 Within 15% of expected
10804 Wykagyl 26 37.1 15 to 50% below expected 34 29.4 15 to 49% above expected
10805 New Rochelle 40 36.7 Within 15% of expected 43 39.5 Within 15% of expected

Notes

  • Incidence data are provisional, November 2011.
  • *This ZIP Code crosses county boundaries. The values provided are for the entire ZIP Code, not just the portion in this county.