Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence by ZIP code , Westchester County, 2005-2009
Source: New York State Cancer Registry
| Primary ZIP Code |
Post Office | Included ZIP Codes | Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | Number of Cases Observed |
Number of Cases Expected |
Percent Difference from Expected | |||
| 10501 | Amawalk | 3 | 1.7 | Very sparse data | 3 | 1.3 | Very sparse data | |
| 10502 | Ardsley | 7 | 14.2 | 50% or more below expected | 6 | 11.6 | Very sparse data | |
| 10504 | Armonk | 7 | 16.4 | 50% or more below expected | 5 | 13.0 | Very sparse data | |
| 10505 | Baldwin Place | 0 | 0.3 | Very sparse data | 0 | 0.2 | Very sparse data | |
| 10506 | Bedford | 8 | 11.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | 14 | 8.8 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 10507 | Bedford Hills | 11 | 10.0 | Within 15% of expected | 17 | 9.4 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 10510 | Briarcliff Manor | 10 | 19.8 | 15 to 50% below expected | 25 | 18.6 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 10511 | Buchanan | 7 | 4.4 | More than 50% above expected | 5 | 3.8 | Very sparse data | |
| 10514 | Chappaqua | 10 | 22.1 | 50% or more below expected | 18 | 17.4 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10518 | Cross River | 0 | 1.3 | Very sparse data | 1 | 1.1 | Very sparse data | |
| 10520 | Croton On Hudson | 10521 | 31 | 28.4 | Within 15% of expected | 35 | 28.7 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 10522 | Dobbs Ferry | 16 | 21.8 | 15 to 50% below expected | 12 | 21.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 10523 | Elmsford | 14 | 14.4 | Within 15% of expected | 10 | 12.9 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 10526 | Goldens Bridge | 2 | 3.1 | Very sparse data | 2 | 2.7 | Very sparse data | |
| 10527 | Granite Springs | 3 | 2.6 | Very sparse data | 1 | 2.0 | Very sparse data | |
| 10528 | Harrison | 25 | 26.8 | Within 15% of expected | 16 | 23.4 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 10530 | Hartsdale | 20 | 29.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | 39 | 29.5 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 10532 | Hawthorne | 16 | 10.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | 8 | 9.3 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10533 | Irvington | 10503 | 12 | 15.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | 17 | 13.6 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 10536 | Katonah | 10 | 22.3 | 50% or more below expected | 12 | 18.7 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 10537 | LakePeekskill* | 4 | 3.2 | Very sparse data | 4 | 2.6 | Very sparse data | |
| 10538 | Larchmont | 20 | 32.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | 26 | 29.0 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10541 | Mahopac* | 10542 | 44 | 47.2 | Within 15% of expected | 55 | 39.8 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 10543 | Mamaroneck | 35 | 39.6 | Within 15% of expected | 35 | 37.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10546 | Millwood | 0 | 2.0 | Very sparse data | 2 | 1.6 | Very sparse data | |
| 10547 | Mohegan Lake | 18 | 12.3 | 15 to 49% above expected | 10 | 11.4 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10548 | Montrose | 10596 | 13 | 9.8 | 15 to 49% above expected | 5 | 6.1 | Very sparse data |
| 10549 | Mount Kisco | 30 | 27.0 | Within 15% of expected | 23 | 24.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10550 | Mount Vernon | 10551 | 68 | 52.0 | 15 to 49% above expected | 57 | 57.5 | Within 15% of expected |
| 10552 | Mount Vernon | 35 | 42.7 | 15 to 50% below expected | 39 | 46.8 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 10553 | Mount Vernon | 15 | 16.6 | Within 15% of expected | 9 | 19.0 | 50% or more below expected | |
| 10560 | North Salem | 10 | 10.3 | Within 15% of expected | 11 | 9.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10562 | Ossining | 10545 | 37 | 54.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | 48 | 50.9 | Within 15% of expected |
| 10566 | Peekskill | 10517 | 48 | 37.0 | 15 to 49% above expected | 42 | 37.4 | Within 15% of expected |
| 10567 | 33 | 33.4 | Within 15% of expected | 37 | 28.7 | 15 to 49% above expected | ||
| 10570 | Pleasantville | 9 | 22.8 | 50% or more below expected | 17 | 19.7 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10573 | Port Chester | 39 | 66.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | 43 | 63.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 10576 | Pound Ridge | 6 | 11.0 | Very sparse data | 4 | 8.2 | Very sparse data | |
| 10577 | Purchase | 3 | 6.8 | Very sparse data | 4 | 5.3 | Very sparse data | |
| 10578 | Purdys | 1 | 1.7 | Very sparse data | 4 | 1.4 | Very sparse data | |
| 10580 | Rye | 25 | 33.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | 32 | 29.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10583 | Scarsdale | 46 | 84.5 | 15 to 50% below expected | 55 | 73.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 10588 | Shrub Oak | 10535 | 7 | 4.0 | More than 50% above expected | 5 | 3.4 | Very sparse data |
| 10589 | Somers | 10519, 10540 | 19 | 30.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | 38 | 29.1 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 10590 | South Salem | 6 | 11.8 | Very sparse data | 8 | 9.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10591 | Tarrytown | 24 | 37.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | 37 | 36.0 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10594 | Thornwood | 4 | 10.8 | Very sparse data | 16 | 8.8 | More than 50% above expected | |
| 10595 | Valhalla | 12 | 15.8 | 15 to 50% below expected | 8 | 15.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 10597 | Waccabuc | 0 | 1.2 | Very sparse data | 1 | 1.0 | Very sparse data | |
| 10598 | Yorktown Heights | 10587 | 33 | 60.4 | 15 to 50% below expected | 57 | 56.3 | Within 15% of expected |
| 10601 | White Plains | 14 | 16.1 | Within 15% of expected | 23 | 21.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10603 | White Plains | 18 | 31.0 | 15 to 50% below expected | 28 | 32.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10604 | West Harrison | 16 | 19.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | 21 | 18.9 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10605 | White Plains | 34 | 45.7 | 15 to 50% below expected | 46 | 43.1 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10606 | White Plains | 10602 | 18 | 27.7 | 15 to 50% below expected | 20 | 28.9 | 15 to 50% below expected |
| 10607 | White Plains | 10 | 15.2 | 15 to 50% below expected | 6 | 13.8 | Very sparse data | |
| 10701 | Yonkers | 10702 | 86 | 87.0 | Within 15% of expected | 90 | 90.5 | Within 15% of expected |
| 10703 | Yonkers | 54 | 44.8 | 15 to 49% above expected | 40 | 46.6 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10704 | Yonkers | 61 | 68.6 | Within 15% of expected | 63 | 63.8 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10705 | Yonkers* | 51 | 55.0 | Within 15% of expected | 54 | 52.5 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10706 | Hastings On Hudson | 8 | 19.2 | 50% or more below expected | 10 | 17.5 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 10708 | Bronxville | 39 | 50.6 | 15 to 50% below expected | 43 | 53.8 | 15 to 50% below expected | |
| 10709 | Eastchester | 10707 | 27 | 41.3 | 15 to 50% below expected | 46 | 38.2 | 15 to 49% above expected |
| 10710 | Yonkers | 62 | 70.2 | Within 15% of expected | 66 | 66.7 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10801 | New Rochelle | 10802 | 62 | 58.0 | Within 15% of expected | 55 | 61.6 | Within 15% of expected |
| 10803 | Pelham | 21 | 22.5 | Within 15% of expected | 21 | 20.2 | Within 15% of expected | |
| 10804 | Wykagyl | 26 | 37.1 | 15 to 50% below expected | 34 | 29.4 | 15 to 49% above expected | |
| 10805 | New Rochelle | 40 | 36.7 | Within 15% of expected | 43 | 39.5 | Within 15% of expected | |
Notes
- Incidence data are provisional, November 2011.
- *This ZIP Code crosses county boundaries. The values provided are for the entire ZIP Code, not just the portion in this county.
