Early Intervention Municipality Performance - Chautauqua County

Evaluation Criteria Federal Fiscal Year
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
1: Percent of children receiving services 30 days or less from the date of the authorizing Individualized Family Service Plan1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.7% 100.0% 98.2% 100.0%
2: Percent of children receiving services in natural environments 99.0% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% 98.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
3A1: percent of children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships) who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they exited the program2 100.0% 99.2% 95.1% 75.0% 81.8% 100.0% 73.7% 80.8% * *
3A2: percent of children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships) who were functioning within age expectations by the time they exited the program2 56.3% 55.8% 45.2% 31.3% 33.3% 80.0% 57.1% 44.3% * *
3B1: percent of children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy) who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they exited the program2 100.0% 99.2% 95.0% 81.3% 100.0% 100.0% 84.2% 79.2% * *
3B2: percent of children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy) who were functioning within age expectations by the time they exited the program2 58.8% 67.4% 51.9% 25.0% 33.3% 80.0% 42.9% 41.0% * *
3C1: percent of children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they exited the program2 98.8% 100.0% 94.1% 75.0% 63.6% 100.0% 80.0% 84.6% * *
3C2: percent of children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs who were functioning within age expectations by the time they exited the program2 55.0% 54.3% 47.1% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 40.0% 36.1% * *
4A: Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know their rights3 93.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 81.8% 100.0% 100.0% * * *
4B: Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effectively communicate their children's needs3 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 81.8% 100.0% 75.0% * * *
4C: Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help their children develop and learn3 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.9% 100.0% 100.0% * * *
5: Percent of children (ages birth to 1 year) served by Early Intervention 1.6% 1.3% 1.5% 1.4% 0.5% 1.2% 0.8% 1.7% 0.7% 0.9%
6: Percent of children (ages birth to 3 years) served by Early Intervention 5.7% 4.9% 5.5% 4.6% 4.3% 4.9% 3.7% 3.5% 3.1% 3.0%
7: Percent of children with Individualized Family Service Plans developed within 45 days of referral to the municipality1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.9%
8A: Percent of children exiting Early Intervention who had transition steps and services4 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
8B: Percent of children exiting Early Intervention potentially eligible for Part B where the school district was notified4 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
8C: Percent of children exiting Early Intervention potentially eligible for Part B who had a transition conference or Committee on Pre-school Special Education meeting4 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
11: Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family achieve positive outcomes as reported in the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)3 97.5% 98.5% 98.4% 93.5% 77.3% 100.0% 75.0% * * *

Notes

  1. Collection of data for Indicators 1 and 7 uses one quarter of the FFY to represent the whole FFY as described in the Annual Performance Plan (APR).
  2. Collection of data for Indicator 3 is sample-based. The sampling methodology is detailed in the State Performance Plan (SPP)/Annual Performance Plan (APR).
  3. Indicators 4 and 11 were sample-based prior to FFY 2018. The reporting method for indicators 4 and 11 was changed in FFY 2018 as detailed in the Annual Performance Plan (APR) and State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP).
  4. Collection of data for Indicator 8 is based on state monitoring as described in the APR.

* Data not available.