Comments by Dan Porreca Posted on January 31, 2008

Page # Line # Comments/Criticisms Suggested Alternatives
19 34 In the definition of "one-to-one" delivery - results to the clinician who ordered the test is spelled out, there is not a reference to the cc'd physicians. Our recommendation is that results to the cc'd physicians should be included in the exclusion because it is common practice in results reporting today (under the current HIPAA authorization/consent) and would cause problems with current systems and workflow if we now required additional consent for information being received today.
23 36 The statement "Clinicians must have the discretion, in consultation with their patients, to withhold information from the health information exchange" appears contrary to the rest of the document. We have 4 different options for dealing with this: 1) Get rid of the paragraph; 2) Anonymize patient ID at the data source to protect the patient identity in the RHIO; 3) restrict data access (submit data to exchange but tag the record to deny access to all except one-to-one exchange; 4) change "clinician" to "entity"; 5) record the visit in a paper chart
25 16 The statement "RHIOs must conform to consumer education program standards developed by a statewide collaboration process and approved by the DOH" left us with a question… When? If there is a target date for these program standards - please publish.
32 20 Relative to "Consent policies and procedures relating to minors"… When? If there is a target date for these PPs - please publish.