Early Intervention Municipality Performance - Wayne County

Evaluation Criteria Federal Fiscal Year
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
1: Percent of children receiving services 30 days or less from the date of the authorizing Individualized Family Service Plan 1 85.7% 75.8% 81.9% 76.4% 78.3%
2: Percent of children receiving services in natural environments 91.2% 91.0% 83.2% 83.3% 83.8%
4A: Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know their rights2,3 N/A N/A 68.4% (n=38;
95% C.I. =
(51.35%, 82.50%))		 N/A N/A
4B: Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family effectively communicate their children's needs2,3 N/A N/A 60.5% (n=38;
95% C.I. =
(43.39%, 75.96%))		 N/A N/A
4C: Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family help their children develop and learn2,3 N/A N/A 89.5% (n=38;
95% C.I. =
(75.20%, 97.06%))		 N/A N/A
5: Percent of children (ages birth to 1 year) served by Early Intervention 1.03% 1.11% 0.91% 0.81% 1.11%
6: Percent of children (ages birth to 3 years) served by Early Intervention 4.03% 4.92% 4.54% 3.77% 4.66%
7: Percent of children with Individualized Family Service Plans developed within 45 days of referral to the municipality 4 100.0% 100.0% 98.9% 94.8% 92.7%
8A: Percent of children exiting Early Intervention who had transition steps and services5 N/A N/A 73.0% N/A N/A
8B: Percent of children exiting Early Intervention potentially eligible for Part B where the school district was notified5 N/A N/A 91.3% N/A N/A
8C: Percent of children exiting Early Intervention potentially eligible for Part B who had a transition conference or Committee on Pre-school Special Education meeting5 N/A N/A 37.5% N/A N/A

Notes

  1. Data to discount children with services that were delayed due to family reasons were not available.
  2. Family outcomes data are sample-based and will be collected once for each municipality in the Federal Fiscal Years (FFY) 2005-2010. For FFY 2005, only New York City family outcomes data were collected. For FFY 2006, family outcomes data were collected for Allegany, Chenango, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Hamilton, Herkimer, Lewis, Madison, Montgomery, Nassau, Orleans, Otsego, Schoharie, Schuyler, Seneca, Suffolk, Tioga, Washington, Wyoming, and Yates counties. For FFY 2007, family outcomes data were collected for Cattaraugus, Cayuga, Chautauqua, Chemung, Clinton, Columbia, Cortland, Essex, Franklin, Genesee, Greene, Jefferson, Livingston, Ontario, Oswego, Putnam, Schoharie, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben, Sullivan, Tompkins, Warren, Washington, Wayne, Wyoming counties, and New York City. For FFY 2008, family outcomes data were collected for Albany, Broome, Dutchess, Erie, Monroe, Niagara, Oneida, Onondaga, Orange, Rensselaer, Rockland, Saratoga, Schenectady, Ulster, and Westchester. For FFY 2009, family outcomes data were collected for Cayuga, Chemung, Cortland, Delaware, Erie, Jefferson, Madison, and New York City.
  3. The 95% confidence interval is the range of values having a statistically acceptable likelihood of containing the actual rate. Due to the low sample sizes (n) for many of these municipalities, these estimates have an extremely high degree of sampling variability. As a result, the 95% confidence intervals are very large. Also, as a result of the small sample sizes, Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals are used, resulting in asymmetric confidence intervals.
  4. Includes delays due to family reasons in both numerator and denominator, which is an acceptable discounting method to the Office of Special Education Programs.
  5. Transition data are sample-based and will be collected once for each municipality in Federal Fiscal Years (FFY) 2005-2010. For FFY 2005, only Nassau, Suffolk, and New York City transition data were collected. For FFY 2006, transition data were collected for Allegany, Chenango, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Hamilton, Herkimer, Lewis, Madison, Montgomery, Nassau, Orleans, Otsego, Schoharie, Schuyler, Seneca, Suffolk, Tioga, Washington, Wyoming, Yates and New York City. For FFY 2007, transition data were collected for Allegany, Cattaraugus, Cayuga, Chautauqua, Chemung, Chenango, Clinton, Columbia, Cortland, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Genesee, Greene, Hamilton, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Livingston, Madison, Montgomery, Nassau, Ontario, Orleans, Oswego, Otsego, Putnam, Schoharie, Schuyler, Seneca, St. Lawrence, Steuben, Suffolk, Sullivan, Tioga, Tompkins, Warren, Washington, Wayne, Wyoming, Yates and New York City. For FFY 2008, transition data were collected for Albany, Broome, Dutchess, Erie, Monroe, Nassau, Niagara, Oneida, Onondaga, Orange, Rensselaer, Rockland, Saratoga, Schenectady, Suffolk, Ulster, Westchester, and New York City. For FFY 2009, no locally representative transition data were collected.

* Data for this municipality have been suppressed due to confidentiality reasons.