New York Department of Health Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program

NYS DSRIP PPS Final Scores and Recommendations: Refuah Health Center

March 13, 2015

Refuah Health Center

Organizational Component Scores

# Section IA Subjective
Points
Awarded		 Total Possible
Subjective
Points		 Panel
Modifications		 Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
1 Executive Summary Pass Pass/Fail N/A Pass
2 Governance 23.95 25   23.95
3 Community Needs Assessment 24.58 25   24.58
5 Workforce Strategy 15.60 16   15.60
6 Data Sharing, Confidentiality
& Rapid Cycle Evaluation		 5.00 5   5.00
7 PPS Cultural Competency/
Health Literacy		 15.00 15 -2.00 13.00
8 DSRIP Budget & Flow of Funds Pass Pass/Fail N/A Pass
9 Financial Sustainability Plan 10.00 10   10.00
  Final Organizational
Subjective Score		 93.13 96.00 -2.00 92.13

Individual Project Scores

#           Project             IA Subjective
Points
Awarded		 Total Possible
Subjective
Points		 Panel
Modifications		 Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
1 2.a.i 40.00 40   40.00
2 2.a.ii 20.00 20   20.00
3 2.c.i 20.00 20   20.00
4 3.a.i 19.33 20   19.33
5 3.a.ii 18.67 20   18.67
6 3.a.iii 20.00 20   20.00
7 4.b.i 100.00 100   100.00

Bonus Points

Section IA Subjective
Points
Awarded		 Total Possible
Subjective
Points		 Panel
Modifications		 Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
2.a.i IDS Bonus 3.00 3   3.00
Workforce Strategy Bonus 1.00 3 2.00 3.00

State of New York
Department of Health
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program
PPS Project Application Score Modifications from DSRIP
Project Approval and Oversight Panel

PPS: Refuah Health Center

Project/Application Component: Workforce Bonus Points

Panel Action Taken: The Panel increased the Workforce Bonus subjective scoring by 2 points from 1 to 3 points.

Explanation: The Panel felt there was sufficient evidence that the PPS did engage a proven workforce healthcare vendor and therefore should be awarded the full available bonus points instead of partial points. The language only indicated the PPS intended to contract with a proven workforce vendor and as a result only partial points were initially awarded by the IA.

Project/Application Component: Cultural Competency/Health Literacy

Panel Action Taken: The Panel decreased the Cultural Competency / Health Literacy subjective scoring by 2 points from 15 to 13 points.

Explanation: The Panel did not feel as if the PPS sufficiently addressed the cultural competency/health literacy needs of the community. Specifically, the PPS did not identify or incorporate the representation of specific Latino and Haitian organizations, which is a growing demographic in the region. Given this exclusion, the PPS was docked two points by the Panel.

New York State Department of Health
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program
DSRIP Project Plan Application Scoring

Organizational and Project Scoring Summary Tables

Organizational Component Scores

Please note, the organizational component score is worth 30% of the final application score.

Section Points Possible Reviewer Scores Subjective Scores Objective Score Panel Adjustment Final Adjusted Score
Section Points Possible 1 2 3 4 5 6 Median Average Trimmed Average Selected Subjective Score1 Workforce Score
Executive Summary Pass/Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass N/A   Pass
Governance 25 22.44 23.29 24.19 24.38 23.29 24.58 23.74 23.69 23.95 23.95 N/A   23.95
Community Needs Assessment 25 25.00 25.00 24.58 23.75 24.58 22.71 24.58 24.27 24.58 24.58 N/A   24.58
Workforce Strategy 20 15.00 15.40 16.00 16.00 14.10 15.60 15.50 15.35 15.60 15.60 2.00   17.60
Data Sharing, Confidentiality & Rapid Cycle Evaluation 5 3.89 5.00 4.72 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.77 4.94 5.00 N/A   5.00
PPS Cultural Competency/Health Literacy 15 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 N/A -2.00 13.00
DSRIP Budget & Flow of Funds Pass/Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass N/A   Pass
Financial Sustainability Plan 10 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 9.63 10.00 10.00 9.94 10.00 10.00 N/A   10.00
Total 94.13

_________________________________________

1. Selected Subjective Score is the highest of the median, average, and trimmed average1


Project Scores

Please note, the project scores are worth 70% of the final application score.

Points Possible Reviewer Scores Subjective Scores Objective Scores Panel Adjustment Final Adjusted Score
Project # Subjective Points Possible 1 2 3 4 5 6 Median Average Trimmed Average Selected Subjective Score1 Scale Score Speed Score
2.a.i 40 40.00 40.00 38.33 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 39.72 40.00 40.00 12.48 32.50   84.98
2.a.ii 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 16.67 20.00 20.00 19.44 20.00 20.00 28.28 40.00   88.28
2.c.i 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.33 16.67 20.00 20.00 19.17 19.67 20.00 31.97 36.57   88.54
3.a.i 20 17.33 20.00 18.67 20.00 16.00 20.00 19.33 18.67 19.20 19.33 25.60 36.00   80.93
3.a.ii 20 17.33 20.00 18.67 18.67 17.33 20.00 18.67 18.67 18.67 18.67 25.88 36.00   80.55
3.a.iii 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 16.67 20.00 20.00 19.44 20.00 20.00 33.75 40.00   93.75
4.b.i 100 88.89 100.00 100.00 100.00 94.44 100.00 100.00 97.22 98.89 100.00       100.00

_________________________________________

1. Selected Subjective Score is the highest of the median, average, and trimmed average1


Final Application Score Calculation

Please note the final application score is comprised of 30% Organizational Score + 70% Project Score + Bonuses

Project # Organizational Score Weighted Organizational Score 30% Project Score Weighted Project Score 70% Bonus (2.a.i IDS) Bonus (Workforce) Bonus (2.d.i Project) Panel Adjustment Final Application Score
2.a.i 94.13 28.24 84.98 59.49 3.00 1.00 TBD 2.00 93.73
2.a.ii 94.13 28.24 88.28 61.79 N/A 1.00 TBD 2.00 93.03
2.c.i 94.13 28.24 88.54 61.98 N/A 1.00 TBD 2.00 93.22
3.a.i 94.13 28.24 80.93 56.65 N/A 1.00 TBD 2.00 87.89
3.a.ii 94.13 28.24 80.55 56.38 N/A 1.00 TBD 2.00 87.62
3.a.iii 94.13 28.24 93.75 65.63 N/A 1.00 TBD 2.00 96.86
4.b.i 94.13 28.24 100.00 70.00 N/A 1.00 TBD 2.00 100.00